{“title”:”Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Jantar Mantar Protest, Citing Lack of Time to Watch Videos”,”content”:”

The Supreme Court’s decision to decline a plea for suo motu action on the ongoing Jantar Mantar protest has left many questioning the judiciary’s priorities. On Wednesday, a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and PS Narasimha refused to entertain a petition alleging police brutality during a demonstration by students at the iconic protest site. The petitioners argued that the court should take cognisance of the situation and intervene to prevent further human rights violations. However, the bench cited a lack of time to watch the videos submitted as evidence, effectively shutting down the plea.

Student Protesters Left to Face Police Action Alone

The Jantar Mantar protest has been ongoing for weeks, with students from various universities and colleges demanding better education, employment opportunities, and an end to police brutality. However, the police have responded with force, resulting in several injuries and arrests. The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene has left the students feeling abandoned and frustrated. Many have taken to social media to express their outrage, using hashtags such as #JusticeForStudents and #PoliceBrutality.

Student leader Rohan Kumar, who was present at the protest, expressed his disappointment with the Supreme Court’s decision. “We expected the court to take cognisance of our situation and intervene to prevent further human rights violations,” he said. “Instead, they have left us to face the police alone. It’s a clear indication that the court is not interested in protecting our rights.”

Concerns Over Police Conduct

The police have come under fire for their handling of the protest. Several videos and photographs have surfaced showing police officers using excessive force against the protesters. The police have also been accused of arbitrarily arresting and detaining students. The Supreme Court’s refusal to watch the videos submitted as evidence has left many wondering about the court’s commitment to upholding the law.

Human rights activist, Harsh Mander, expressed his concern over the police conduct. “The police have a duty to protect and serve the public, not to brutalize and intimidate them,” he said. “The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene is a clear indication that the judiciary is not willing to hold the police accountable for their actions.”

Future of the Protest Uncertain

The Supreme Court’s decision has left the future of the protest uncertain. The students are determined to continue their fight for their rights, but the police are likely to continue their crackdown. The situation is volatile, and it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the growing unrest. One thing is certain, however – the Supreme Court’s decision has sent a clear message that the judiciary is not interested in intervening in the matter.

The Supreme Court’s decision has left many feeling disillusioned and frustrated. The students’ protest may have been unsuccessful in securing a suo motu action, but it has brought attention to the growing concerns over police brutality and human rights violations. The situation is far from over, and it remains to be seen how the government and the judiciary will respond to the growing unrest.

“,”excerpt”:”The Supreme Court declined to take suo motu action on the Jantar Mantar protest, citing a lack of time to watch videos submitted as evidence. Student protesters feel abandoned and frustrated by the decision, which has left the future of the protest uncertain.”,”tags”:[“Supreme Court”,”Jantar Mantar Protest”,”Police Brutality”,”Human Rights Violations”,”Student Protest”],”meta_description”:”The Supreme Court declined to take suo motu action on the Jantar Mantar protest, citing a lack of time to watch videos submitted as evidence.”}